Noru fits when
Privacy is a first-class obligration and you want Article 30 records derived from your code, on the same control library as SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2 and DORA — with AI that drafts and people who decide.
Comparison
Noru vs Sprinto: platform comparison
Sprinto is profiled from its own public pages, then compared with Noru where both can be evidenced. Unsourceable claims are left out.
What Sprinto says it does
Sprinto calls itself an autonomous trust platform that detects changes and acts across compliance, vendor risk and AI governance, with named AI agents for evidence, fixes, vendors and trust. It cites more than 4,000 customer companies.
Its pricing page states 25+ frameworks automated out of the box and 200+ digitised; its directory includes SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA and ISO 42001, with a dedicated DORA page and a NIS 2 offering. Pricing is not published: Foundation and Growth tiers are quoted, with additional frameworks, AI governance and enterprise modules — including Privacy Management — sold as add-ons or modules.
Sprinto states that the audit fee and the subscription are separate bills. Its trust center lists AWS as its hosting provider, with primary regions in California and Frankfurt.
Decision
Which one fits
A quick way to evaluate which platform matches your compliance goals.
Sprinto fits when
You are a startup on a first certification, want the broadest framework directory of the platforms compared here, and are comfortable with AI agents acting autonomously across the programme.
Compared on what we can evidence
| Feature | Noru | Sprinto |
|---|---|---|
| Published framework catalogue | 30+ frameworks, mapped once and reused | 25+ automated out of the box; 200+ digitised |
| NIS2 and DORA | Supported | DORA framework page; NIS 2 offering |
| AI approach | Cortex drafts from your evidence; humans review and decide | Autonomous AI agents for evidence, fixes, vendors and trust |
| Pricing model | Platform plus capability packages, scoped per deployment | Not published; two tiers, extra frameworks as add-ons |
| Data residency | EU data residency by default | AWS; EU primary region in Frankfurt among others |
| Privacy records from source code | Article 30 records derived from code and CI, using an open privacy taxonomy | Privacy Management module; code-derived records not stated |
| AI client access (MCP) | Model Context Protocol server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and others | Not stated |
Where Noru is differentiated
Privacy records of processing derived from source code and CI, on the same control library as security frameworks
AI that drafts from your evidence, with every output reviewable before it enters the programme
EU data residency for every customer, not a region choice
A Model Context Protocol server so AI clients can query the live compliance programme
Where Sprinto is strong
A large framework directory — 200+ digitised by Sprinto's count
Named AI agents across evidence, remediation, vendors and trust
An EU primary hosting region in Frankfurt
A stated base of more than 4,000 customer companies
How we compared
Every statement about Sprinto is taken from Sprinto's own public pages, listed under Primary sources below.
Where Sprinto does not state a position publicly, the cell says so rather than inferring one.
Capability claims about Noru are our own and are not attributed to Sprinto.
Claims were last checked on 2026-10-17. If something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
How much does Sprinto cost compared with Noru?
Neither publishes prices. Sprinto quotes its Foundation and Growth tiers and sells additional frameworks as an add-on. Noru licenses the platform plus the capability packages your obligations require, priced per deployment, with a written quote after a demo.
How does Noru's AI differ from Sprinto's?
Sprinto describes autonomous agents that act across the programme. Noru's Cortex drafts from evidence already in your programme, and nothing it drafts — a policy, a control mapping, a legal basis — takes effect until a person accepts it.
Does Sprinto host data in the EU?
Sprinto's trust center lists Frankfurt as one of its primary AWS regions, and its API offers a European base URL. Noru stores and processes every customer's data in the EU by default.
Can we migrate from Sprinto to Noru?
Yes. Evidence is collected from your own systems, so migration is largely reconnecting integrations, bringing across policies and registers, and re-mapping controls. We scope it during a demo.
Do you train AI models on our compliance data?
No. Customer data is never used to train, fine-tune or evaluate any model — Noru's or a provider's — and every AI feature runs under zero data retention terms, so the model provider returns the output and keeps no copy of the prompt or response. Both commitments are contractual, in Section 4.6 of our Terms and Sections 3.5–3.6 of our DPA. Ask every vendor you shortlist for the same in writing.
Primary sources
Every claim about Sprinto on this page comes from the public pages below, last checked on . Competitor products and prices change — if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
See Noru against your own systems
A 45-minute walkthrough against your frameworks, your integrations and your evidence — and an honest answer on whether Noru is the right fit.