Noru fits when
Your obligations go beyond eight frameworks — NIS2, DORA, the EU AI Act, GDPR records of processing — and you want a hosted platform with EU data residency rather than software you run.
Comparison
Noru vs Comp AI: platform comparison
Comp AI is profiled from its own public pages and repository, then compared with Noru where both can be evidenced. Unsourceable claims are left out.
What Comp AI says it does
Comp AI positions compliance automation as a way to close deals, and says it gets teams SOC 2 audit-ready in days. It describes AI that generates policies and assessments, agents that collect evidence, and agent-run penetration testing.
Comp AI publishes its code on GitHub under AGPL-3.0, with a portion under a commercial licence, and documents Docker-based self-hosting. It lists eight frameworks: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 42001, ISO 9001 and NEN 7510.
No rate card is published; the pricing page says price depends on frameworks, headcount, timeline and whether audit, penetration test or trust center are included, and shows a money-back guarantee badge without stated terms. We found no hosting-region statement.
Decision
Which one fits
A quick way to evaluate which platform matches your compliance goals.
Comp AI fits when
You want source code you can inspect or self-host, your frameworks are on its list, and speed to a first SOC 2 is the priority.
Compared on what we can evidence
| Feature | Noru | Comp AI |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Commercial platform, hosted by Noru | Open source (AGPL-3.0), with a commercially licensed portion |
| Published framework catalogue | 30+ frameworks, mapped once and reused | Eight frameworks |
| NIS2, DORA and the EU AI Act | Supported | Not listed |
| ISO 42001 | Supported | Supported |
| Pricing model | Platform plus capability packages, scoped per deployment | No rate card published |
| Data residency | EU data residency by default | Not stated |
| Privacy records from source code | Article 30 records derived from code and CI, using an open privacy taxonomy | Not stated |
Where Noru is differentiated
30+ frameworks on one control library, including NIS2, DORA, the Cyber Resilience Act and the EU AI Act
EU data residency for every customer, operated by Noru
Privacy records of processing derived from source code and CI
A Model Context Protocol server so AI clients can query the live compliance programme
Where Comp AI is strong
Source code published under an open-source licence
A documented self-hosting path
A focus on getting to a first SOC 2 report quickly
ISO 9001 and NEN 7510 on its framework list
How we compared
Every statement about Comp AI is taken from Comp AI's own public pages and repository, listed under Primary sources below.
Where Comp AI does not state a position publicly, the cell says so rather than inferring one.
Capability claims about Noru are our own and are not attributed to Comp AI.
Claims were last checked on 2026-10-17. If something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
How much does Comp AI cost compared with Noru?
Neither publishes a rate card. Comp AI says its price depends on frameworks, headcount, timeline and add-ons. Noru licenses the platform plus the capability packages your obligations require, priced per deployment, with a written quote after a demo.
Is Comp AI fully open source?
Its repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, and the README says a portion of the code is under a commercial licence. Noru is a commercial platform; it uses an open privacy taxonomy for data manifests.
Does Comp AI support NIS2 or DORA?
Neither is on the eight-framework list Comp AI publishes. Noru supports NIS2, DORA and the EU AI Act on the same control library as SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
Can we migrate from Comp AI to Noru?
Yes. Evidence is collected from your own systems, so migration is largely reconnecting integrations, bringing across policies and registers, and re-mapping controls. We scope it during a demo.
Do you train AI models on our compliance data?
No. Customer data is never used to train, fine-tune or evaluate any model — Noru's or a provider's — and every AI feature runs under zero data retention terms, so the model provider returns the output and keeps no copy of the prompt or response. Both commitments are contractual, in Section 4.6 of our Terms and Sections 3.5–3.6 of our DPA. Ask every vendor you shortlist for the same in writing.
Primary sources
Every claim about Comp AI on this page comes from the public pages below, last checked on . Competitor products and prices change — if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
See Noru against your own systems
A 45-minute walkthrough against your frameworks, your integrations and your evidence — and an honest answer on whether Noru is the right fit.