Comparison
Secureframe is profiled from its own public pages, then compared with Noru where both can be evidenced. Unsourceable claims are left out.
Secureframe describes compliance, risk and trust automation backed by in-house compliance experts. Its framework page lists named frameworks rather than a total — including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA, the EU AI Act, ISO 42001, HIPAA and FedRAMP — plus custom frameworks.
Secureframe publishes a starting price for its Fundamentals tier and quotes Complete and Defense, a tier built for CMMC. Each tier includes one compliance framework, with more available to add, and AI questionnaire answers and Trust Center requests are capped on Fundamentals. Its AI features are branded Comply AI.
Customers choose AWS US East or AWS London for hosting, with further European regions described as coming soon. Audits run through Secureframe's Audit Partner Network, and its support pages say the cost depends on the auditor.
Decision
A quick way to evaluate which platform matches your compliance goals.
You are an EU company, or sell to EU customers who require hosting in an EU member state, and privacy and EU regulation sit alongside your security frameworks: Article 30 records, DPIAs, NIS2, DORA and the EU AI Act on one control library.
You want a published starting price to budget against, you are pursuing CMMC and want a tier built for it, or UK hosting meets your requirements for European data.
| Feature | Noru | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| Published framework catalogue | 30+ frameworks, mapped once and reused | Named frameworks plus custom; no total stated |
| NIS2, DORA and the EU AI Act | Supported | Listed |
| Pricing model | Platform plus capability packages, scoped per deployment | Starting price published for Fundamentals; other tiers quoted |
| Framework scope at entry | Packages licensed to the obligations you carry | One framework per tier; more can be added |
| Data residency | EU data residency by default | AWS US East or AWS London (UK) |
| Privacy records from source code | Article 30 records derived from code and CI, using an open privacy taxonomy | Not stated |
| Audit | Not an audit firm; you contract your auditor | Audit Partner Network; cost depends on the auditor |
| AI client access (MCP) | Model Context Protocol server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and others | Not stated |
EU data residency for every customer, with AI inference the one activity that may leave the EEA, under Standard Contractual Clauses
Privacy records of processing derived from source code and CI rather than authored by hand
Capability packages licensed by the scope they govern, rather than one framework per tier
A Model Context Protocol server so AI clients can query the live compliance programme
A published starting price, which makes early budgeting easier
A Defense tier built for CMMC, with SPRS tracking, SSP and POA&M and a managed CUI enclave
The EU AI Act and DORA already on its listed frameworks
In-house compliance experts as part of the offer
Every statement about Secureframe is taken from Secureframe's own public pages, listed under Primary sources below.
Where Secureframe does not state a position publicly, the cell says so rather than inferring one.
Capability claims about Noru are our own and are not attributed to Secureframe.
Claims were last checked on 2026-10-17. If something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
Secureframe publishes a starting price for Fundamentals and quotes its other tiers; our Secureframe pricing guide sets out the figures on the record. Noru does not publish a price list: it licenses the platform plus the capability packages your obligations require, priced per deployment, with a written quote after a demo.
Secureframe offers AWS US East or AWS London. London is in the UK rather than an EU member state, and Secureframe describes further European regions as coming soon. Noru stores and processes every customer's data in the EU by default.
Where the data lives and how privacy is run. Both automate SOC 2 and ISO 27001; Noru adds Article 30 records derived from your code and EU residency for every customer, while Secureframe adds a published entry price and a CMMC tier.
Yes. Evidence is collected from your own systems rather than held only in the incumbent, so migration is largely reconnecting integrations, bringing across policies and registers, and re-mapping controls. We scope it during a demo.
No. Customer data is never used to train, fine-tune or evaluate any model — Noru's or a provider's — and every AI feature runs under zero data retention terms, so the model provider returns the output and keeps no copy of the prompt or response. Both commitments are contractual, in Section 4.6 of our Terms and Sections 3.5–3.6 of our DPA. Ask every vendor you shortlist for the same in writing.
Every claim about Secureframe on this page comes from the public pages below, last checked on . Competitor products and prices change — if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
A 45-minute walkthrough against your frameworks, your integrations and your evidence — and an honest answer on whether Noru is the right fit.
